Would the Pentagon try Vietnam today, with the Chinese now protecting Asia?

Comments

1. Showtunes says:

   November 8, 2009 at 07:47

   No We ran by the Chinese in Corée and they have almost Na not the capacity qu& #39; they have aujourd& #39; today. We could actually obtained the country, if not for China, but plutôt let us let we them give each other our military échec in first.
2. georgebonbon says:

   November 8, 2009 at 08:20

   Numéro.

   L' Iraq has a good d' number; oil. 4 tankers Iraqi ports d' a congé of day, dirigés for refineries of the USA.
3. sci says:

   November 8, 2009 at 09:01

   You n& #39; do not have simply least the idée think you? A spirit is a terrible thing à to lose s& #39; it you plaît return ticket in études or at least to show à courses. George you too! The pétroliers are dirigés towards l& #39; Europe. Ret. USAF SNCO
4. desertviking_00 says:

   November 8, 2009 at 09:50

   China and Vietnam are all? S? the war there was some ann? es. They aren '; t best friends. Back? your history class.
5. (ro)Bulldog says:

   November 8, 2009 at 10:02

   No. Today, the military threat that China and is a partner of Russia are allies awareness on the new geopolitical map of the world are to big for the U.S. defeat in itself. You'll also see a gap between political leaders who lead a wonderful life in Washington DC, and many paid holidays throughout the world. . . and the true American (or "bought") military strategy and the geniuses who are virile disregarded. Sci Viking and you the worst case, teaching part-history education U. S. China has always been to protect or interfere with the policies of their neighbors. China was at war with Russia, but this does not prevent him from doing joint operations worldwide, visit the documentation on the truth beyond military defeat U. S in Vietnam and Korea (I have studied these problems during my studies on international security Masterworks). Now we can boldly say that the superpowers of the time did not intend to step on each other extended (in order to plunder the country weak) hands. . . Leaders are lovers of the world and they do not want to be in many destructive wars that raise no benefit for them. You can see the extensive cooperation between NAFTA, the Euro and ASEAN, as well as "friends" of discussions between the Russians, Europeans, Chinese and Americans while dividing the cake. . . Friends do not go to war to another.
6. Mohammed F says:

   November 8, 2009 at 10:06

   I am sure that Japan, Taiwan, South Korea, the Phillapeans deny your claim that China is the protector of Asia.
7. movngfwd says:

   November 8, 2009 at 10:06

   United States a threat? America just wants (as you said) 1. Justify their military expenditures but also 2. To make money to rebuild the country they destroyed 3. For restalk heel military America 4. Investing in new military technology All for the sake of protecting the American Dream. . . and preserve the American Economic Engine. (continued growth) PS: If China wants to kick the ass of America in the Vietnam War in 1970. . . they would have. But. . . What good is having this done to China? No profit. . . just a shame. . . there was no underlying reason to do so. . . therefore. . . China has refrained from doing so.